Zenithstar 61 vs redcat 51. The Redcat requires something sturdier like the ZWO AM5.

Zenithstar 61 vs redcat 51 Is the Zenithstar 61 a good telescope? It's pretty good. MiniCat 51 WIFD RedCat 51 II RedCat 51 WIFD RedCat 61 WIFD RedCat 71 RedCat 71 WIFD. I have shortlisted the newer version of RedCat 51 and Radian Raptor 61 as the final two. Andy says: January 14, 2019 at 7:31 pm. I have an In this William Optics RedCat 91 review, This is the fourth RedCat I’ve used in the RedCat series—five if you count the two versions of the RedCat 51 The William Optics Zenithstar 61 is a doublet apochromatic refractor telescope that excels in deep-sky DSLR astrophotography. Starting a savings fund right now for that Pleiades 111mm. A Rokinon 135mm is the ideal focal length, aperture, and size for the small trackers like a Star Adventurer, fast Janer_2 wrote: Down the road I had planned on getting something like the Zenitar 61 or the Redcat 51 (something equivalent). 0x Adjustable Flattener + William Optics 48mm T-mount for Sony E-mount . No, using a smaller than full frame sensor doesn't magically change the focal length of your scope, You should be able to get awesome images with either the 51 or 61. And that wasn’t all they had to show us! William and James also revealed a prototype of their new RedCat 71 Petzval refractor. It is a 4 element petzval vs the doublet z61. This is a 178mm focal length Petzval-type telescope. Free US Shipping Over $50. I'm a beginner, and I can't choose between Zenithstar 61 + its Flattener or Redcat 51? Which one would you choose and why? Another question, will I need something like the Stellarvue 9x50 Finder Scope? not sure if the doublet can match the petzval 4 element design. 9; William Optics Pleiades 68: 260mm at F/3. Zenithstar 73 III Gold . 8 reducer was horrible and the 1:1 was better but not perfect. I was wondering if anyone would have any recommendations as to which scope would be a Page 2 of 2 - Redcat 51 (Gen 3), Redcat 61 (Gen 3), and Askar 300 Pro APO - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: For a Sky Watcher Star Adventurer. If you thought the adorable little Zenithstar 61 was cute, wait until you see the RedCat. Get answers to your questions in our photography forums. Red Cat 51 has a shorter focal length but it does not require a flattener, and it looks much more beautiful. This vs the (I think 4 element) Petzval RedCat design, which doesn't need a flattener, that is also slightly faster at f/4. In this review, I’ll tell you why I think the William Optics Zenithstar 61 is a top contender when it I currently have a Redcat 51 and it just blows me away every time I take it out. Hi there, So my fiancé broke my Redcat. Zenithstar William Optics RedCat 61 Apochromatic Petzval Refractor. Any ideas which is better? I mainly want to take shots of deep SharpStar 61 EDPHII / Radian Raptor 61. Order Here: https://bit. This blog post delves into a detailed comparison o Whether capturing distant galaxies or observing planetary details, the ZenithStar 81 WIFD is an excellent choice for serious astronomers. Lists the glass used. Adding their 0. Most Read Articles • Contact Us Hi Kanak! Welcome to Astrobin! I also use the Skyguider Pro with a William Optics Zenithstar 61, and I recommend the combo, with some caveats The weight of the Z61, guide-scope, guide-cam, DSLR, red-dot-finder (optional, but with my Bortle-8 skies it's really helpful when star-hopping) flattener, dew-heater and DSLR is slightly above 50% of the max load of William Optics Zenithstar 81 APO £1,798. 75; ZWO AM3 RedCat Limited Edition. 00 Add to Basket. Heads and shoulders above the Sharpstar/Radian 61 - Redcat 51's filter drawer is easily accessible and easy to use. Add to Cart. Build quality is excellent, and it is a flat field, even with the SW flattener rather than the WO one- i never tried it without as for imaging you need a spacer, or a FF to get focus, so i always have it in the imaging train with a DSLR. UniGuide 32mm f/3. This 61mm APO Astrograph is a great refractor for astrophotographer Redcat 51 vs Astro-tech AT60ED - posted in Refractors : Hi, 2. 0; GuideStar. I have a C8, Esprit 100, and a Zenithstar 61. With a 51mm aperture and an f/3. He's so annoyed the he's considering selling the Z61 for the RC51. Cat 91 WIFD; Ultra-Cat 76 ; Ultra-Cat 108; Zenithstar 61 II; Zenithstar 73 III; Zenithstar 81 WIFD; 2 Elements APO Design. 1 William Optics Zenithstar 61 + William Optics Flat61 1. As an owner of the Whitecat 51 (Redcat was out of stock and Spacecat hadn't been released yet) I have to say yes, it's worth it over a camera lens. The 61edph is about half the price of the FRA 300. i’m not sure which focal length is better. The real reason I say the redcat is I currently own the William Optics Z61, which is 368mm, and I want a wider FOV more often than I want it to be more narrow. I'm pairing the scope with a Sky Adventurer and a Sony A6000 APSC camera. The AT60ED with a reducer-flattener is the same. Zenithstar 73 $730. Redcat is 51mm /250mm Askar 60mm/300mm. 🤣 Considerations: William Optics 2019 Gran Turismo GT71 APO Triplet Refractor; William Optics New Super Zenithstar 81 f/6. For the telescope, I'm torn between a WO Redcat 51, and the WO Zenithstar 73. Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. 75; Innovative Petzval optics in the William Optics Redcat series provide sharp, high-contrast images with minimal With a Star Adventurer or similar, and without autoguiding, the Z61 might be pushing it a bit. Cat Series; Ultra-Cat Series; Pleiades Series; Gran Turismo Series; Focal length of the RedCat is 250 mm. I doubt you'd ever outgrow the Redcat but if it's galaxies in particular that you want to image then it may not be the best choice. Featuring top-notch Ohara FPL-53 ED glass, this telescope delivers clear, high-contrast images with minimal color aberration. William Optics Pleiades 68 + ZWO ASI2400MC Pro. Evostar 72ed vs Redcat 51 vs Zenithstar 73 iii - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im needing advice on what scope to get, Ill be getting the Heq5 Pro and using my Nikon D7500 and will upgrade to a dedicated camera later on. For comparison, the RedCat 51 weighs 5. Looking to upgrade from a Redcat 51 to a higher The William Optics Zenithstar 61 II APO with UniGuide guidescope is a compact and light telescope setup for wide-field viewing and astrophotography. . As Table 3 shows, some William Optics field flatteners are fixed devices for particular telescopes like the ZenithStar 61 and ZenithStar 73. The redcat has better CA. The Redcat requires something sturdier like the ZWO AM5. 9; William Optics RedCat 61: 300mm at F/4. The features itself are great, focus is For astrophotography, you will want a Zenithstar and a corresponding flattener which is $700 together, same price as the Redcat. I would go with the redcat or their new 61mm version. Zenithstar 61 Red . Optical performance is easily outperformed by a regular lens. William Optics Riser Blocks for GT102, ZenithStar 103, WIFD GT81, WIFD RedCat71 Telescopes ( Our Price: $32. 7 lbs), it is perfect for astrophotographers who value on-the-go convenience and ease of transport. William Optics v3 RedCat 51 WIFD (2) £849. Cat 91 WIFD; Ultra-Cat 76 ; NGC 7000 with Redcat 51 on Canon EOS 6D ThorkildC's gear list: I have the SkyWatcher and I was tempted by the RedCat (and the ZenithStar 61). Redcat 51 LX vs Radian Raptor 61 - posted in Refractors : Hi, I am new to Astrophotography and am looking to purchase my first imaging scope to pair with ZWO 1600mm-Pro. Rokinon 135mm f2, AT MOST a Redcat51, but youll absolutely need a guiding setup at that point. 0; Guiding Scope 50mm f/4. William Optics RedCat 51: 250mm at F/4. So if you are a ZWO fan, or use ZWO products, these match perfectly with each other! Williams Optics RedCat 51 Sharpstar 61EDPH II Williams Optics Zenithstar 61 Sky-Watcher Evostar 72 Doublet Any suggestion? Thanks a But, luckily for star tracker users, the Sharpstar 61 EDPH II is available here and it's the best value small telescope you can buy. 25lbs and the RedCat 71 weighs 9. Weight: 4. My main camera is a Pentax K-1 and I mount the whitecat on either a Losmandy G-11 or Explore Scientific IEXOS-100. Cat 51 WIFD; Cat 61 WIFD; Cat 71 WIFD; Ultra CAT. I wonder could a 250mm focal I want something portable, easy to use and does not require much setup time, so I have narrowed down my choice to the Zenithstar 61 and Redcat 51, as they match my requirements pretty Why I prefer the Redcat 51 - Build quality. I currently have (had) a Redcat 51 and looking at a new purchase, while also upgrading from Exploring Astrophotography: SharpStar 61 vs. but a very small aperture. At this point both optical systems are roughly the not sure if the doublet can match the petzval 4 element design. Might wait on the AT60EDP, but I've also looked at the FRA300 and of course the Redcat 51. I sent my AT60ED back yesterday and I'm going with a Petzval for its replacement. Gran Turismo 81 . FEATURES. A place to ask questions & help others with anything related to astrophotography The Redcat 51 is designed for imaging. Durability Meets Portability: Crafted from CNC-machined aluminum, the Redcat 51 WIFD provides durability without sacrificing portability, ensuring it’s always ready for your next adventure under the Zenithstar Series. 9 I'm looking at purchasing a new scope. 9 focal ratio, this telescope will allow you to capture stunning celestial images. Zenithstar 81 Blue . William Optics has done it again. F/5. Page 1 of 2 - Redcat 51 (Gen 3), Redcat 61 (Gen 3), and Askar 300 Pro APO - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions. Pleiades Series. The Sharpstar 61 EDPH III (EDPH III) is the next-in-line triplet APO on the EDPH 61 series, which comprises two low-dispersion ED glass, but the third type is not mentioned. The z61 is $830 with a field flattener. I Sharpstar 61edph II vs Askar FRA 300 - posted in Refractors : I’m looking at purchasing a small imaging scope around 60mm. (I will say that the 61mm is noticeably heavier than the 51mm, The Aura Carver 10. Also was looking at other William optics refractors like GT71 and GT81 for future updates. Guider. Pleiades 68 WIFD Pleiades 111 WIFD. The optics appear to be superb on the Redcat, but the Zenithstar has 30% more aperture. William The William Optics RedCat 71 is the bigger brother to the highly-regarded RedCat 51, which has been raved about by astrophotographers since its release. Clear skies! Reply. Following up its wildly popular RedCat 51 and RedCat 71, the company has released its new RedCat 61. Expected in early 2020, this little gem is the big brother of the popular RedCat 51. The Pleiades is extremely stocky. 9, a masterpiece of precision engineering. A place to ask questions & help others with anything related to astrophotography For example the Zenithstar 61 is a 360mm doublet for 650 and you'll need to buy a flattener (possibly get a reducer/flattener depending) for 200 more, so 850 for a 360mm f/5. Design: S-FPL-51 2-element achromatic doublet: FPL-53 4-element Petzval apochromatic doublet The 0. The ZS61 and 61 EDPH II are easier to add a focusing motor and may have a longer focal length than the RedCat 51 so it is all dependant on the targets that you want to go after. I have two imaging mounts RedCat 51 (250mm FL): Best spot sizes for a scope < 80mm. I friend of my purchased the Evostar 72ED witch matches quite well with The Redcat 51 is a triplet apo and it's a good one. The William Optics RedCat 51 telescope and Canon EOS Ra mirrorless camera. I have opportunity for field work, but I enjoy the easiness of doing this from my backyard and controlling the session from my living room. Buy DETAILS (1) The newborn Zenithstar 61II (2020 Model) The very latest RedCat 51 II by William Optics features an improved helical focuser and an updated tension 26K subscribers in the AskAstrophotography community. - Images are well corrected - Built in tilt corrector if adjustment is It's quite similar to the Z61 but beats it by being a triplet element setup so it gets better color focus and it's cheaper too! Redcat 51 is quite wide FOV and undersampled on 3. Light, compact and sturdy, the William Optics Zenithstar 61 apo refractor makes the perfect travelling companion. The RedCat 61mm weighs 7. 8x reducer-flattener drops the focal length to 288 mm. It is a Petzval design meaning it has an integrated field flattener so stars at the edges of the field will be well corrected. The RedCat 51 stands out due to its unique blend of portability, performance, and style. Unfortunately large sample variation. This widefield scope is short, light, and red, white, and black in colour. The latest version comes with some new enhancements including its novel patented internal focusing mechanism. The AT90CFT is tempting, but I want simplicity and at this point (to me) that means a Petzval at native FL. 8; Gum 15 in the constellation Vela. ly/3oRLLTjThe William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD has arrived! See my first impressions of this slick little refractor telescope, and why i The ZenithStar 61 has a focal length of 360 mm, not 580 mm. 75 We got our hands on the new William Optics RedCat 61 and it's time to put it to the test. 1" HD Digital Frame is a great way to put your portfolio on display and a great way to surface forgotten memories. 9 for 750. 5 (after the reducer) vs F6, which means that you'll collect signal 1. Zenithstar 61 II; Zenithstar 73 III; Zenithstar 81 WIFD; 2 Elements APO Design. Another telescope that is an excellent match for this mount is Looking to upgrade from Samyang 135mm F2. Ideal for astrophotography and wildlife viewing, it boasts a quick f/5. I own a WO GTF102 with a focal length of 783 mm. Starter Deep-Sky Astrophotography Kit. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit redcat 51 or zenith star 61/73 with asi533 . 75 micron pixels, but is a great little scope on APS-C sensors. Gran Turismo Series. Focal length of the WO ZenithStar 61 is 360 mm. HTH Zenithstar 61 II; Zenithstar 73 III; Zenithstar 81 WIFD; 2 Elements APO Design. But this kitten has claws (I couldn’t resist). Also wondering if backfocus and image quality (CA and MiniCat 51 WIFD; Cat 51 WIFD; Cat 61 WIFD; Cat 71 WIFD; Ultra CAT. UniGuide. It weighs much more than you think it would (almost 9 pounds) considering its small profile. The 61 more because the traditional focuser. Looks very sexy Includes bahtinov mask Has rack and pinion focuser, probably better at focusing and likely stronger The draw tube also extends out 75 mm vs aprox 35 mm for the 72ed so you get more flexibility in that department. I was strongly considering it but in the end end I went with a doublet instead to save money. With a slightly larger focal length than the RedCat 51, the ZenithStar 61 offers a bit more reach while still allowing for larger objects such as the Andromeda Galaxy and larger nebulae to easily fit into the field I want something portable, easy to use and does not require much setup time, so I have narrowed down my choice to the Zenithstar 61 and Redcat 51, as they match my requirements pretty well. Maybe I just go for the RedCat or the Zenithstar 61 for the The ZenithStar 61 Apo refractor offers exceptional optics while being extremely portable. I understand these two to be optically equivalent, so really it's just comparing prices and features in the different packages you find. Perhaps a Redcat would be a better option for this kind of setup, given the slightly faster aperture, lower weight and focal length. I rocked a I'm a beginner, and I can't choose between Zenithstar 61 + its Flattener or Redcat 51? Which one would you choose and why? Another Now my choices are Red Cat 51 and Zenith Star 61. Cat 91 WIFD; Ultra-Cat 76 ; Ultra-Cat 108 Zenithstar 61 II; Zenithstar 73 III; Zenithstar 81 WIFD; 2 Elements APO Design. 47lbs, which makes it fairly lightweight. I’m interested in the Redcat 61 and the Pleiades 68. It seems the latest WO68 has the same coma my 61 had on a few peoples recently purchased units. It's basically a doublet with a flattener built in. The focuser is a non issue if you plan on getting an auto focuser. Tracking and guiding are much easier at shorter focal Zenithstar 61 or Redcat 51? - posted in Equipment (No astrophotography): I have Nikon D850 & iOptron SkyGuider Pro (with iPolar), will also get the Optolong L-eNhance filter. William Optics Zenithstar 61 II APO Refractor OTA £579. Among the options available, the SharpStar 61 and RedCat 51 stand out as compelling choices. I’d really like to know what the focal length of the latter scope is. Since you mentioned the ZenithStar 61, which I have, my first thought was what mount are you using. The redcat will have slightly better correction, but the Z61 I don't have an opinion on the z61 vs redcat, both have their pluses and minuses, the redcat will probably offer the better sharpness and aberration correction. If your choosing between these you might want to look at regular camera Introducing the Redcat 61 Astrograph f/4. Can you pull the reducer out of the Raptor if you want to, or is that permanent? William Optics RedCat 51 / SpaceCat / NightCat. 15kg (4. 9; In a sense, the RedCat 51 series is a hybrid between a telescope and a manual-focus camera lens. Redcat is faster f4. William Optics Zenithstar 61. The two I’m looking at are the Sharpstar 61edph II and the Askar FRA300. The SkyGuider Pro and Zenithstar 61 combo is an excellent portable rig to get started in deep sky with. 9# 7. This is a great looking portable setup. William Optics Redcat 51 III (Gen 3) GO GET YOURSELF A REDCAT 51 – YOU WON’T REGRET IT! COMPLETE LIST OF WILLIAMS OPTICS TELESCOPES AND ACCESSORIES AVAILABLE IN SOUTH AFRICA THROUGH GLAGENCIES AND SELECT SUPPLIERS . My Redcat 51 on the other hand is both much sharper than his Z61, it NEVER LOSES FOCUS, even across multiple nights (his Z61 has to refocus every few hours) and it can EASILY capture all the classic DSOs in their full glory. Skip to content. William Optics GT81 WIFD Apochromatic Refractor (1) £1,649. MiniCat 51 WIFD; Cat 51 WIFD; Cat 61 WIFD; Cat 71 WIFD; Ultra CAT. Small, lightweight, fast. 75; William Optics expects the GuideStar 61 to be available in November 2019. Been looking around a lot and my first option was the Redcat 51 II. 1# The SV503 works easily with standard tripods and even portable mounts like the Star Adventurer Mini. 899,00zł Zastanawiam się też nad tym, czy lepszy wyborem będzie kompletowanie sprzętu n Just fyi the redcat 51 is super overpriced for what you get. 00. If you don’t get an auto focuser the focuser is still quite nice and I don’t find it to be a problem. Gran The Andromeda Galaxy using the William Optics Zenithstar 61. The focal length of the Zenithstar 61 is 360mm, which creates a useful field of view for many deep-sky astrophotography objects. The dedicated field flattener (flat61) This latest addition to the RedCat series combines portability with superior optical performance, Cat 51 WIFD; Cat 61 WIFD; Cat 71 WIFD; Ultra CAT. Zenithstar 61 Gold . WO Redcat 71 vs GT-81 vs FLT-91 - posted in Refractors : hi! I am looking for opinions. Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. William Optics, a respected name in the realm of astronomy equipment, has crafted a piece that’s garnered attention for good reasons: introducing the newly redesigned RedCat 51. Edited by Kevin_A, 02 February 2024 - 07:17 PM. 9. Not sure how much better the FRA 300 is in comparison. The original redcat 51 version 2 is a good popular choice and has great reviews . Pros. Cat 91 WIFD; Ultra-Cat 76 ; Ultra-Cat 108 ZWO AM3 RedCat Limited Edition. There is also Askar 400-500-600 similar to the GT71 & GT81. Zenithstar 81 I have the WO61 and i am surprised at the comments that suggest you should possibly choose something else. 5 bare, F/4. OK, I want to get a wide field scope. In Stock. Telescope. Travel Telescope for Astrophotography Beginners Equipment Discussions. If you’re looking for a budget friendly refractor without compromising on optical quality, look no further than the ZenithStar Z61II apochromatic doublet refractor. With its compact form factor and lightweight design, weighing just 2. 8x faster than the Z61, The RedCat 51 has superb optics and would not need any flattener as it is of petzval construction with a flat field and had a focal length of 250mm. Im a beginner, and I cant choose Redcat 51 WIFD vs Redcat 61 WIFD? - posted in Refractors : Getting ready to buy a Redcat 61, but considering 51 vs 61 (new WIFD models), which do you recommend? Theres a 50mm FL difference and size/weight difference, but if it were you , which would you recommend? Hi all I’m looking for a good telescope for astrophotography to use with my Canon EOS M50 I’ve narrowed it down to the Redcat 51 and the Zenithstar 73. With its advanced optics and f/4. I've come to the same conclusion after having the same issues. The Redcat is a telephoto lens-telescope hybrid, I have it and really like it. 9 vs z61 f5. 9 focal ra I own a Zenithstar 80 ED II (with flattener) and the REDCat 51 and while I do love my Zenithstar the Image Quality (round stars etc) The sharpstar 61 scope is also F4. The colors are vibrant, and the build quality is solid, but the Carver isn't without a few quirks. 46lbs. William Optics Mounting I'm a beginner, and I can't choose between Zenithstar 61 + its Flattener or Redcat 51? Which one would you choose and why? Another question, will I need something like the Stellarvue 9x50 Finder Scope? not sure if the doublet can match the petzval 4 element design. 20K subscribers in the AskAstrophotography community. William Optics MiniCat 51 Refractor offers a new ultra-widefield imaging choice in their RedCat range. 61mm diameter, 360mm focal length, f/5. The redcat comes with a flat field of view whilst the zenithstar requires a field flattener. I image mainly from a Bortle 9 sky. Im wanting to capture nebulae, as many as possible but it seems Im most interested in diffuse nebulae. I live in Australia and scopes Unleash your passion for the cosmos with the compact and powerful William Optics ZenithStar 61 II APO Refractor. The FOVs of these three scopes is very similar. RedCat 51 In the realm of astrophotography, choosing the right telescope can significantly impact your celestial imaging endeavors. I also have a ASI071 (APS-C sensor), ASI533, and a ASI183. 54 V. The William Optics Zenithstar 61 II APO features an air-spaced doublet lens with fully multi-coated optics and an Ohara FPL-53 ED glass element for sharp, FPL-53 is also noticeably better than Ohara's lower-spec FPL-51 glass, which offers an abbe index of 81. Cat Series; Ultra-Cat Series; Pleiades Series; Gran Turismo Series; Zenithstar 61 $498. The Z61 is the most portable telescope ever made by William Optics, a company with a reputation for building beautiful astrophotography refractors. All the other suggestions have substantially longer focal lengths. From my research, they all cost about the same, Z61 w/ bag, dovetail, field flattener, and T mount & Redcat w/ bags, dovetail and T mount. The William Optics Zenithstar 61 is a doublet apochromatic refractor telescope that excels in deep-sky DSLR astrophotography. 5 focal ratio to enable quick data collection, this Zenithstar 61 II; Zenithstar 73 III; Zenithstar 81 WIFD; 2 Elements APO Design. The redcat 51 is $865. 00 View. But now I came across Askar astrograph. I am looking at: Redcat 51 Dzień dobry, Mam pytanie: który refraktor APO sprawdzi się lepiej w astrofotografii głębokiego nieba z dedykowaną kamerą astro na montażu EQ5 SynScan? RedCat WIFD OTA (51/250) 3. And both are likely long-term investments, which should give you years of fun. 989,00zł ZS61 II OTA (61/360) 2. Telescopes . Experience the ultimate in astronomical photography with Redcat. 75; UniGuide 50mm f/4. 5 with reducer. It’s not just a telescope; for many, it’s a gateway to the cosmos. Cat Series; Ultra-Cat Series; Pleiades Series; Gran Turismo The Redcat is bulkier and less portable. The 51mm objective lens on the RedCat is made from top-quality FPL-53 and FPL-51 glass (synthetic fluorite) which creates a flat frame image from corner to corner, even when utilizing the entire image circle with a full-frame camera. hho erjopdo ihll ybsvnx obs lqv ytbm eltpz redgefdv jupjr dbckt rbzfqc eio pwun aqz